Tag: executive development

  • 3 Keys to Effective Organizational Communication

    3 Keys to Effective Organizational Communication

    [vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

    3 Keys to Effective Organizational Communication

    Minimizing frustrations across many levels

    By Dr. Ted Sun 

    You made significant efforts to create an effective plan to launch a project. It took months to integrate all the moving parts. You’ve communicated it multiple times throughout the organization. When kickoff starts, nothing is going as planned. Very few people are doing what they are supposed to do. How frustrating is it to see numerous problems arise when it seems that very few people stuck to your plans?

    Unfortunately, this is all too common in numerous organizations, from established corporations to firms looking to grow. The impacts of effective communication can be seen on many levels, including employee retention, project budgets and timelines, service delivery, customer satisfaction, burnout, workplace stress, productivity, etc. Communication is much more than a skill working with the hierarchies of an organization. Successful organizations design communications from a systems perspective, synthesizing technology, leadership skills, and memorable content. It functions within the hierarchy of the organizational structure, but also weaves through a web-like learning structure. It is so much more than a skill or a certificate program you complete in a few weeks.

    Hierarchy of Communication

    All organizations operate functionally with some type of hierarchy. While this is needed for work design and task completion, communication tends to be much more lucrative and often not linear. At the executive level, leaders often don’t get accurate information on problems fast enough; by the time they become aware of the problem, it’s distorted through many layers of the organization. This creates ample frustration and a constant need to solve major problems.

    At the lower levels, many lack the full information needed to perform their jobs. For example, one organization made strategic changes in product pricing and delivery to be more competitive in the marketplace. While it made perfect sense at the top level, how it gets implemented failed to get to the lower levels. The team on the ground felt stupid for not knowing these changes in the system, and now they have to go back to the customers and change all the work they had completed. While it makes perfect sense for information pertinent to the job to be transparent at the lower levels, how it’s communicated makes a world of difference. Too often, an email isn’t enough. The communication problem often bleeds into new employees as onboarding information rarely reflects the constant adaptations of strategy at various levels of the organization, leading to more problems down the line as new employees step into their roles. To overcome these communication problems across the entire organization, successful organizations use a systems approach to communication.

    3 keys to Effective Communication Systems

    Communication is the lifeblood of organizations – this is one of the few statements I recall from one of my professors, Jeff Ford. After decades of research, publishing, teaching, and consulting, this statement has always been at the heart of almost every engagement.  While designing communication systems involves numerous elements, we’ll speak to three of the most important keys.

    1. Memorable Content: Any communication requires content that is meaningful and memorable. Every human being is exposed to 11 billion bits of data each second. Most of that data is ignored. Approximately 40-50 bits of data get consciously processed by our brain. But processing data does not become long term memory. This is a common flaw in many training programs where people assume that exposure to new information equates to knowledge gained. In reality, most of what we process is forgotten. For information to be memorable, emotional hooks in the brain must be consciously integrated into the contents. The stronger the emotion, the more likely it will become knowledge with sustained recall. This is where emotional intelligence and knowledge of your employees are key. What do your employees care about? How might you channel the content of your communication to something that’s meaningful for them? Organizational systems, such as employee inventory, have to support the content design from an emotional perspective.
    2. Synthesizing Technology: Technology seems to be abundant in today’s workplace. Too often, it gets very confusing. Technology such as emails, Slack, salesforce, etc. creates a myriad of options for information storage and transfer. At the core of technology, a knowledge management system is the centralized location organized for employee access. Employees need to know where they should look to find the relevant information quickly. We’ve seen organizations scatter different technology across various departments. One may use email more often, while another department uses Slack. And they point to different sources like Salesforce or Microsoft dynamics (such as Teams and others). How people leverage a centralized technology system leads toward considerations at the source of information.
    3. Leadership skills: While conventional wisdom tends to speak to communication skills in general, we’re exploring this with a wider lens. Communication skills are composed of numerous skills such as active listening and Socratic methods. They also require alignment of specific values that form healthy perceptions of people, which extends into the leadership realm. Consider managers who see their team as people who are there to perform a task dictated to them or goals set for them; their desire to communicate will be limited. We’ve seen many top-level executives apply a collaborative communication approach with their peers, and apply a dictator approach with lower level employees. Especially with new generations, how you communicate is more than half the battle. Leaders need to be conscious of how they are communicating more than ever in order to be inclusive and let their employees’ voices be heard. No matter what kind of content is being communicated, numerous leadership skills are needed to effectively get the message across. I recently ran a number of sessions in a larger program focused on asking open-ended, empowering questions. It was amazing to see the leaders’ struggles with asking open-ended questions. Their organizational culture has drowned them with close-ended and limiting questions for many years that it’s very hard to retrain their minds. Such skills are crucial for plans to be effectively executed.

    As you explore the systems of communication within your organization, consider this question – if you are not there, who’s sharing your knowledge in a way that others will remember and effectively execute?  This is where you begin to explore communication at the systems level – not by any one individual or a group, but through a system that maximizes retention.

    We’ll leave you with one consideration: Effective communication is the response you desire.

    Let’s explore how to enhance your communication systems to minimize communication problems and drive the results you deserve. And, more importantly, let’s do it so you have more control of your schedule and not be frustrated with people not listening. Email Cody – Cmcmichael@tc-university.org

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

  • Who Wants Loyalty to Money?

    Who Wants Loyalty to Money?

    [vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

    Who Wants Loyalty to Money?

    Overcoming The On-going Retention Challenge

    By Dr. Ted Sun & Cody McMichael

    Surprise! A vital employee left your team without much of a notice. As it turns out, this employee went to another organization for a $12,000 increase in annual compensation. Unfortunately, this is happening more and more often where organizational talent leaves for more money. While some organizations blame the departing talent, the toxicity of compensation-based reward system goes much further. Many organizations don’t realize that their existing compensation structure trains people to be loyal to money. It only gets worse in the struggle to find new talent. Organizational leaders often end up having to increase salary ranges to attract highly needed employees, which drives up costs and continues to reinforce employees’ loyalty to money. It becomes a vicious cycle that no one can win. This has to stop.

    Problems with Traditional Management Theories

    In many conversations with leaders across the world, no one wants to train their employees to be loyal to money. On the surface, we see salary demands increase across the board as inflation hits everyone’s pockets. Worse yet, the commitment to work continues to decrease. Traditional management theories are the primary influences on this reality. One of the basic assumptions in management practice is that employees are without intrinsic value. Work is a mere exchange between one’s time at work and financial compensation. While we have come a long way with numerous ideas about how to lead, most organizational systems fail to integrate those concepts into practice. Compensation structures are typically limited to financial compensation and a suite of benefits.  Managers often end up managing their employees’ time input for compensation.

    In one manufacturing organization, a few employees see a minor quality problem in the line. They know it will produce a small percentage of flawed items which they’ll have to come back and fix after the customers complain. Being paid for their time, they continue with the production run. This minor quality issue grows exponentially down the production line and becomes costly for the organization, not to mention to loss of trust from the customers. With a focus on time for money, it would only yield more overtime pay when they must come back and fix it. Unfortunately, the lack of care for the quality of work has increased over the last decade. It’s not uncommon to see employees, and even people at the senior management level, not care about the work they perform. It’s not uncommon now to see leaders make multiple commitments about completing a task in a certain time, and then to backout repeatedly. In some cases, it is due to the number of problems that haunt them. But in many, even a 15-minute task commitment gets ignored once work time is finished. Where is the integrity and responsibility in the workplace?

    A Systemic View of Employee Retention

    Two fundamental issues must be addressed to maximize employee retention. First, leaders need to approach this from a solution orientation, rather than a problem orientation, which is commonly taught in most educational organizations and consulting firms. We’ve gotten used to looking at exit interviews trying to learn how to avoid people leaving, and not enough time is spent on why people stay and continue to be engaged. In a recent analysis of a statement of work by a major consulting company, every aspect of the solution took a problem-based approach. They focused on data from exit interviews, analysis of current culture, and limited interviews with management. In trying to address the retention issue, this firm had no focus on what the ideal culture should look like. Furthermore, the statement of work had no mention of any organizational systems.  This brings us to the second fundamental issue of lack of systems thinking.

    Consider your workplace as a game that people come to play. Currently, it is often a game of come to work, whether remotely or in person, and get paid for your time. What if you changed the game to be much more interesting? Systems thinking enables leaders to see the various people systems that create the rules of the game. Integrating with solution orientation, why do your top talent stay and continue to be productive and exceed expectations year after year? Decades of research has shown that money is rarely ever the top reason. Looking at the systems that drive how employees perceive their workplace, it will involve several influences such as meaningful work; continued learning and growth; personal achievement; and, more importantly than ever since the pandemic, relationships. Almost every leader would say how important it is to build trust among their team, but how many have regular actions that systemically build trust on a daily or weekly basis? A trust system can build trust no matter who’s in charge, while ensuring it happens consistently across every department. Linear strategies are insufficient to maximize retention. When leaders take a solution orientation approach and implement carefully thought out systems, they can achieve over 90% talent retention, along with many other desired outcomes.

    Beyond Generic Engagement Strategies

    Tackling talent retention requires the fundamental skills of solution orientation and systems thinking. It is much more than generic engagement strategies, which often require systems support. For example, if you taught active listening to all of your management, what systems would support the mastery of this skill? How would you know that the prerequisite of this skill exists in the healthy perceptions of team members? Is there a safe learning environment in which to practice? What holds people accountable to applying what they were taught? How is performance management integrated with this new skill, along with emotional pay for the management and their respective teams? These are just some of the questions that challenge leaders to go beyond generic strategies and begin to think at the systemic level.

    In a time where we feel like we are more connected than ever through all our technologies and social media, we are more disconnected than ever. We no longer have to plan to go to the stores for anything. With a few clicks, individual products show up at our doorstep. Many rely on instant messages for surface level communications. Meaningful conversations that build the depth of respectful and trusting relationships are not as common as they used to be. Being disconnected is costly for any organization. Survival isn’t enough when the market is changing and society is becoming less connected. The workplace has no choice but to build the community to thrive with limited human resources. Especially with larger and more powerful competitors fighting for talent, like Amazon, Facebook, and Intel, strategic leaders need to design and implement people systems that get the best from every employee.

    A community that cares with a committed partner

    Imagine your workplace having a sense of community. A community of people working together to learn, grow, innovate, and produce something meaningful at the individual employee level as well as the organizational level. This community has an inclusive culture that radiates authentic care at every level. With Transcontinental University’s global expertise and EduSulting approach, your organization can achieve this level of employee engagement. We can develop your leaders to master the necessary skills needed to implement various systems while providing guidance towards seeing the systemic nature of organizational design and strategies. Let’s explore how to move your employees away from being loyal to money and start building a meaningful community that makes work productive and engaging. Email Cody – Cmcmichael@tc-university.org

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]